Transmission system

ABSTRACT

A wavelength division multiplexing transmission system, the system comprising: a plurality of channels at different wavelengths, each channel comprising a transmitter, a receiver, and one or more amplifiers, the system further comprising an encoder for encoding data with a coding, and; a decoder for decoding transmitted data; prioritizing means for prioritizing the data on each channel; monitoring means for monitoring directly or indirectly, raw (uncorrected) bit errors on each channel; power adjusting means for, varying the power on a channel in response to the bit error rate.

This invention relates to a transmission system for transmitting data indigital format, and particularly, but not exclusively to a transmissionsystem for transmitting signals over a long distance, for example, longhaul dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) systems such as thoseused in submarine systems. The invention also relates to long haul overland systems such as cross continental terrestrial systems.

A wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) system comprises a plurality oftransmitters and receivers for transmitting data at differentwavelengths or channels through the system, and generally a plurality ofin-line amplifiers positioned at spaced apart intervals along the systemfor boosting the power of light being transmitted through the system.The amplifiers are typically rare earth doped amplifiers, and a part ofthe system between a transmitter and receiver is known as a link.

Generally, such WDM systems are installed by equipment vendors, andoperators offering telecommunications services to customers who buy thesystems from the equipment vendors.

To allow for ageing in the in line amplifiers and other components andto compensate for losses incurred in cable repairs, the operators buildin significant levels of overall optical signal to noise ratio (OSNR)margin into the system at the outset. This in effect reduces thecapacity of the link by as much as four times.

In addition, it is well know that when data is transmitted via atransmission system, errors may be introduced into the data due to noisein the system.

The longer the distance over which the data is transmitted, the moreerrors are likely to be introduced to the data.

Operators generally carry a mixture of classes of traffic through WDMline systems. These different classes of traffic are related todifferent service level agreements (SLAs). The highest revenue earningtraffic will be referred to herein as A class traffic and comprises forexample data from banks and other institutions which must be able toguarantee complete security and integrity of the data transmittedthrough the system. Such traffic is often provided on a fully protectedbasis in order to minimise outages that may occur when the system needsrepairing.

The lowest class will be referred to herein as B class traffic and maycomprise for example data from private individuals requiring access tothe Internet. The B class traffic earns the least revenue and is oftenprovided on a best efforts basis. In general, the volume of A classtraffic will be significantly lower than lower tariff (B class) traffic.

It is known that rare earth doped amplifiers have different powercapacities at different wavelengths. However, in recent years with theemergence of filtering techniques, such as Bragg Gratings, it ispossible flatten the power capacity curve of rare earth doped amplifiersso that the gain for each separate wavelength is more or less equal.Despite this flattening, long systems still exhibit a notable lack ofgain flatness and it is therefore necessary to pre-emphasise certainchannels to ensure that each channel is nominally equivalent to eachother channel. Pre-emphasis is achieved by putting more power into thepoorer channels than the better channels. This means that at thereceiver all channels appear equal.

In older transmission systems, where the level of gain flatteningsophistication is lower, more attention to pre-emphasis is required toovercome significant levels of non-flatness.

When setting up a WDM link, it is necessary to calculate a power budgetfor the link. This is generally a co-operative process taking placebetween the equipment vendor and the operator. When working out thepower budget, an ageing margin of several dBs will be set aside tocompensate for cable repairs and system/component ageing. Damage to thesystem can be either permanent and caused by repairs or permanentdeterioration in either the transmission medium or the in-line opticalelements such as the transmitter receivers and amplifiers.Alternatively, damage may be transient. Polarisation Mode Dispersion(PMD) is a significant transient phenomena, being particularlydeleterious at high transmission rates such as 10 Gbit/s and 40 Gbit/s.

The ageing margin is designed into the system at the outset. Thisexercise normally entails the generation of a power budget for aparticular link, making an estimate of how the various elements willdeteriorate over the lifetime of the system and building this into thelink power budget. Due to the fact that transmission technologies arecontinually evolving it is difficult to make an estimate of these ageingelements. It is therefore common to take a very conservative positionand it is not uncommon to build in an ageing margin of typically >5 dBon the most important links in the system such as long haul submarinelinks. This ageing margin can therefore be considered as 5 dB or moreworth of lost power capacity throughout the lifetime of the system.

According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided awavelength division multiplexing transmission system, the systemcomprising;

-   -   a plurality of channels at different wavelengths, each channel        comprising a transmitter, a receiver, and one or more        amplifiers.    -   the system further comprising an encoder for encoding data with        a coding, and;    -   a decoder for decoding transmitted data;    -   prioritising means for prioritising the data on each channel;    -   monitoring means for monitoring directly, or indirectly, raw        (uncorrected) bit errors on each channel;    -   power adjusting means for varying the power on a channel in        response to the bit error rate.

According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provideda method of managing data traffic transmitted via a wavelength divisionmultiplexing transmission system, the method comprising the steps of:

-   -   allocating a priority to data to be transmitted;    -   directing data to a predetermined channel in the transmission        system;    -   encoding the data prior to transmission using an encoder, and        decoding the data after transmission using a decoder;    -   monitoring directly or indirectly raw (uncorrected) bit errors        on each channel;    -   adjusting the power to each channel in response to the monitored        bit error rate.

Preferably, the system comprises an FEC encoder and decoder.

Advantageously the monitoring means comprises a FEC error detectioncircuit.

Alternatively, the monitoring means comprises a multi-level softdecision circuit.

The monitoring means may comprise either a FEC error detection circuit,or a multi-level soft decision circuit, or both.

It is known to use error detection or correction code, particularlyForward Error Correction (FEC) coding in order to reduce or eliminateerrors in the data. The use of such codes uses up available bandwidth inthe channel that could otherwise be used for transmitting data.

In the present invention, adaptive techniques are used to avoiddegradation of service in the event of a deteriorating signal quality.In the event of a deteriorating signal quality, it is important to havea significant leeway between the point where the deterioration isdetectable and the point where adaptation is essential to avoidunacceptable degradation of service. There are several known techniquesfor detecting deterioration while the delivered bit error rate is stillvery low.

In systems using FEC, detection of raw errors is generally automaticwithin the system, so that, whenever the system corrects one or moreerrors, these are identified and can be counted. This means that, for agradual deterioration, raw errors can be detected well before the onsetof delivered errors (after error correction). Typically, this provides aleeway of several orders of magnitude between first detection and thepoint of unacceptable increase of delivered bit error rate. It should,however, be remembered that an order of magnitude in raw error rate cancorrespond to a fraction of a dB in signal to noise ratio; this meansthat it is necessary to ensure that the magnitude of the leeway is aslarge as possible.

Given one or more information sequences (in digital form) it is known toapply FEC in the following way: the source information, which may bethought of as a series of digital information words, is encoded into acode word, this being longer than the corresponding information word bythe addition of coding overheads. This is transmitted over acommunication channel with the possible injection of errors at the rawbit error rate (ber). After decoding, an estimate of the original codeword is recovered, with the potential that the information source wordand the recovered estimate are identical (error free), or else exhibit asignificantly lower error rate than the raw ber. This is achieved at theexpense of requiring a larger bandwidth because of the coding overhead,and this in turn increases the bandwidth carrying system penalties. Thecoding overhead can be separated and transmitted on a second channel, orit is possible to partition the code word in other ways and again carrythe two parts of the code word on separate channels. In either case, thereceived sequences are re-combined before decoding.

In systems where FEC is not being used, it is possible to applyerror-detection coding at much lower overhead than required for errorcorrection. In such situations, however, a simpler solution is to add aparity bit to each block, because the block can be long to minimise theoverhead, and error detection can be effected quite simply. Even thoughisolated errors can be detected, it is difficult to achieve adequateleeway between first error detection and the onset of unacceptable errorrates. Without FEC, a bit error rate of 10⁻¹² may be required, andtherefore detection at a level of 10⁻¹⁵ or less is desirable. However,at a bit error rate of 10 Gb/s, this would correspond to a rate of oneper day. The timescale for system changes could be much shorter thanthis. Therefore, even with perfect error detection, the measurement ofvery low error rates may be slow.

An alternative non-FEC solution that considerably speeds up themeasurement of low error rates is to use multilevel (or soft) detection.In a multilevel soft decision circuit, a clock is provided to mark outregular decision instances, and at each instant a decision is madebetween a “1”, corresponding, typically, to the signal voltage beinggreater than the pre-determined threshold and a “0” which corresponds toa voltage less than the threshold. A multilevel decision circuit canprovide additional information to distinguish between clear decisions(e.g. “1” corresponds to 1 volt for instance above threshold) andmarginal decisions (e.g. “1?” corresponds to a signal above thresholdbut less than 1 volt). The onset of occasional “1?” or “0?” results willgive an indication of reducing margins before a significant increase inactual errors. An example of this principle is shown in FIGS. 7 and 8.

When FEC is employed, multilevel detection is again applicable andadvantageous. The leeway between first detection and unacceptabledelivered error rates is widened through a two-stage effect. If thesignal gradually deteriorates, the first indication is through theappearance of occasional “1?” or “0?” decisions while the raw bit errorrate is still extremely low. Then, with further signal deterioration,the onset of a significant raw bit error rate can be tolerated stillwithout significant delivered bit error rate—i.e. degradation ofservice. An additional advantage of employing multilevel detection inthe presence of FEC is that the coding system can take advantage of theadditional information in distinguishing between “1” and “1?” toincrease the coding gain.

While four-level detection has been described by way of illustration,any number can be used.

It is advantageous to apply a mulit-level technique (such as the onejust illustrated) in tandem with a direct measure of raw ber viaerror-detection. With a gradual onset of channel impairment, adetectable proportion of “1?” or “0?” signals would be received whilethe raw ber itself is still so low as to be undetectable within a usefultimeframe. In this regime, it is possible to make an estimate of theunderlying raw ber from a knowledge probability distributions of thereceived signals. With impairment a large proportion of the receivedsignals is likely to be in the “1?” or “0?” bands and in this regime rawber is more accurately estimated from error-detection. There is furtherscope for channel impairment before the raw ber reaches a level whereeffective error-correction breaks down and unacceptable delivered ber isreached. These two regimes together offer an effective margin betweeninitial onset of a raw ber and the onset of delivered bit errors.

In addition to the above techniques that apply at the detection stage ofa received signal, early warnings of the imminent onset of errors cancome from a range of “health checks” at any part of the transmissionsystem, such as monitoring the laser operating point and opticalamplifier gain margins. These “health checks” could possibly be used toanticipate the risk of imminent impairment. The transmission systemcould then advantageously apply this information to prepare for the mosteffective form of response if and when the ber thresholds are reached,taking into account current traffic priorities.

It is known to design a transmission system so that the transmissionchannels will have some maximum acceptable raw ber (ber_(max)) such thatwith the operation of FEC, the end to end performance will meet pre-setquality criteria. Complex systems such as transoceanic optical fibresystems will inevitably include many variable components, and in thecourse of designing the system to tolerate these with minimum risk offailing to meet targets, there will typically be a significant marginbetween actual performance and minimum performance. For example, the rawber will typically be some orders of magnitude below the ber that can becorrected for by the FEC. Moreover, this tolerance will typically bevariable due to many variables such as optical polarisation effects suchas Polarisation Mode Dispersion (PMD), Polarisation Dependent Loss (PDL)and Polarisation Dispersion Gain (PDG), temperature variation, fadingand ageing.

Because a transmission system according to the present invention is ableto react to increasing raw ber it is able to reduce power in channelscarrying lower priority traffic if the raw ber exceeds the maximumacceptable raw ber (ber_(max)). Because of the ability to monitor andthen react to increasing raw ber, a transmission system according to thepresent invention is able to operate within a margin that conventionalsystems have had to work below, since conventional systems are not ableto cope with increasing raw ber. By means of the present inventiontherefore more traffic is able to be carried on the transmission systemsince lower priority traffic will be dropped if necessary in order tomaintain the raw ber within acceptable limits.

Further, by means of the present invention it is possible to adapt tothe changing quality of transmission on two or more channels so as tomaximise the amount of traffic that can be carried. In the case ofdeterioration below design targets, it is possible to minimise the lossof service. Conversely it is possible to harness the otherwise unusedtolerance margins by transmitting more traffic. It is to be understoodthat in maximising the amount of traffic care must be taken not toadversely effect the quality of the transmission.

If bit error rate on a particular channel increases, it is possible toreduce this ber by increasing the power on a channel. However, it willnot be possible to continually increase the power on a system, as to doso would mean exceeding the power budget.

Because the nature of the data carried out on such systems can begenerally divided between A class traffic and B class traffic, asdescribed above, it is possible to prioritise data being transmitted onthe system.

If necessary, it is therefore possible to withdraw traffic from achannel carrying low priority (B) traffic in order to reduce the biterror rate of the high priority traffic, since a lower level of trafficleads to a lower bit error rate. This improvement can be effected byclosing down the channel, and transferring power that had been used bythat channel to a channel carrying high priority (A) data withoutexceeding the power budget of the system. Alternatively the channelcarrying (B) traffic can be kept open, and the capacity freed up bywithdrawal of traffic can be applied to a re-optimised FECconfiguration, for example, by letting it carry additional FEC overheadsfrom one or more high priority channels, as described in our co-pendingUK patent application No. 0208560.3, the contents of which areincorporated herein by reference, and from which this application claimspriority.

By means of the present invention therefore, it is possible to ensurethat channels carrying the A class traffic are allocated sufficientpower to ensure the acceptable bit error rate is not exceeded. As theamount of A traffic is almost always very much less than the amount ofother traffic, it should always be possible to manage the power in thisway. In addition, the channels carrying high priority data will bepositively biased using pre-emphasis. This ensures that if a systemdeteriorates suddenly the channels will survive in a physical sense.

An important feature of the present invention is that the detectionfacility of the FEC function may be used to maintain the relationshipbetween A class channels and the remaining traffic over a long period oftime and to pro-actively switch off the lower class of channels in theevent of a severe transience on the line or a permanent step change.Under such circumstances the channels may be switched off permanently.

Preferably, the power adjusting means reduces power to channels carryinglow priority data such that, if appropriate a channel carrying lowpriority data is switched off.

This has the effect of reducing traffic and power to the system.

Alternatively, the power adjusting means may increase the power to thesystem. This can be particularly appropriate if the system is running ata power much less than the maximum power available to it. The maximumavailable power is determined by the power budget of the system.

Advantageously, the system further comprises a controller forcontrolling the power adjusting means.

Advantageously, the data carried by the transmission system is encodedwith FEC coding.

Conveniently, the power adjusting means is further adapted toadditionally switch off a channel.

Preferably, the system further comprises means for pre-emphasising achannel prior to transmission of data.

The invention will now be further described by way of example only withreference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a transmission system accordingto a first aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 2 a is an output power spectrum for an arbitrary four channel DWDMsystem;

FIG. 2 b is an output power spectrum for an arbitrary four channel DWDMsystem after say 2,000 kilometers with no pre-emphasis;

FIG. 2 c is an output power spectrum for the arbitrary four channelafter say 2,000 kilometers with pre-emphasis;

FIG. 2 d is an output power spectrum for the four channel DWDM system ofFIG. 1 showing additional channels available due to the exploitation ofthe margin according to the present invention and with pre-emphasis ofbest channel;

FIG. 3 is a representation of a control algorithm for adjusting power inthe transmission system of FIG. 1 following withdrawal of low prioritytraffic;

FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 are graphical representations showing how raw ber maybe controlled by means of the present invention;

FIGS. 7 and 8 are graphical representations of a 4 level decisioncircuit.

Referring to the figures, a transmission system according to the presentinvention is designated generally by the reference numeral 10 (FIG. 1).

The transmission system comprises a plurality of transmitters 12, andplurality of receivers 14. In the illustrated embodiment of theinvention there are four transmitters and four receivers to define fourchannels along which data can be transmitted. However, it is to beunderstood that the invention applies to transmission systems having anynumber of channels and therefore any number of transmitters andreceivers. The system 10 further comprises inline amplifiers 16, amultiplexer 18 and a demultiplexer 20.

Referring now to FIGS. 2 a to 2 c, the power output spectrum for anarbitrary four channel DWDM system is shown. The figures show howpre-emphasis results in all channels being nominally equivalent. Asshown in FIG. 2 c, channels 1 to 4 (represented by reference numerals201, 204, 203, and 204 respectively) appear to the receiver to be equal.

In older systems, where the level of gain flattening sophistication islower, more attention to pre-emphasis will be required to overcomesignificant levels of non-flatness.

Referring to FIG. 2 d, the output spectrum for the four channel DWDMsystem of FIG. 1 after say 2,000 kilometers is shown. In this system,additional channels exists due to the exploitation of all availablemargins, for example, ageing, repair etc The system now has 8 channels201 to 208. This system incorporates bias pre-emphasis on the channelthat will carry the A class channel which in this case is channel 202.All other channels are nominally equal.

At the outset, a power budget is calculated for the system 10 and amaximum power P_(max) is therefore calculated. Alternatively P_(max) maybe worked out empirically during system commissioning. At any timeduring transmission, the system will be operating at a particular powerknown as P_(used), where P_(max)>/P_(used)

Data entering the system for transmission is encoded using an FECencoder, and then decoded after transmission using an FEC decoder.

When using FEC coding it is possible to detect errors in each of thechannels.

For each channel an acceptable maximum bit error rate, ber_(max) iscalculated. A controller 22 incorporating a control algorithm 24responds to the measured ber on each channel and sets the output powersetting according to the measured ber. Initially, an operator inputsinto the controller details of target bit error rates.

As data enters the transmission system 10, it is categorised accordingto its priority. For example the data maybe categorised as higherpriority for A class traffic and lower priority for B class traffic.However, the data maybe further subdivided into any number of differentpriority levels as appropriate.

The system will be set up so that high priority data is directed ontoparticular known channels. The operator will input details of channelproperties into the controller 22.

If the ber increases on a particular channel, the output power of thetransmitter on that channel may be increased to thereby reduce the ber.However, the combined output of all the transmitters in the system,P_(used) must be less than or equal to P_(max) which is the maximumpower available according to the power budget.

FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 show how channel impairment, or raw ber can vary withtime, and how a system according to the present invention can manage thelevels of raw ber. In each of these three figures time is expressedalong the X axis and channel impairment in terms of raw ber is shown ona notional scale on the Y axis. Typically raw ber is measured on adecibel scale. The figures show variation of time exaggerated forclarity.

Each of the FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 shows the hypothetical level of channelimpairment which can be tolerated by a system according to the presentinvention compared to a level of channel impairment that can betolerated in a known transmission system.

Referring to FIG. 4, the curve representing channel impairment in atransmission system according to the present invention is designated bythe reference numeral 42, and the curve indicating a maximum level ofchannel impairment available in a conventional transmission system isindicated by the reference numeral 40.

In conventional transmission systems, there is a conventional threshold34 that a system is designed to operate below. This means that a systemis designed so that under normal circumstances the channel impairmentwill not exceed this conventional threshold 34. However shouldcircumstances dictate that the channel impairment increases above thislevel, for example because of ageing of the system, and the system willstill function since a wide ageing margin has been built into the designof the known system.

Typically, the conventional threshold 34 is several dBs below the hardthreshold 30. In practice, the conventional threshold 34 cannot be setin terms of some measured ber, but rather in terms of setting signal tonoise ratio several dBs lower than the minimum for an acceptable ber.

By contrast, a transmission system according to the present invention isable to utilise this margin. An artificial threshold known as a softthreshold 32 is used when calculating the acceptable level of channelimpairment that the transmission system can tolerate. The differencebetween the soft threshold 32 and the conventional threshold 34 isindicated by the line 38 and is known as the margin.

A third threshold is also identified, the hard threshold 30. In atransmission system according to the present invention, it isunacceptable for the channel impairment to rise above the hard thresholdlevel.

If the level of channel impairment increases above the soft threshold 32then it may not be possible for the system to carry all traffic beingtransmitted. Thus there is a period of time indicated by the line 44when the transmission system according to the present invention has toreact to the higher channel impairment level as will be explained inmore detail herein below.

Turning now to FIG. 5, the two curves 40, 42 are again illustrated. FIG.5, illustrates how a transmission system according to the presentinvention may react to a level of raw ber above the soft threshold 32.

Once the channel impairment rises above the soft threshold for exampleto point 50, the power to a particular channel carrying low prioritydata may be reduced or even switched off completely. This results in thetraffic that had been carried by that channel being reduced or evencompletely eliminated. The reduction in traffic carried by thetransmission system results in a reduction in the channel impairmentwhich brings the raw ber to below the soft threshold level. In additionthe power that had been used on the particular channel can be allocatedto other channels, thus increasing the power on those channels. This inturn results in a reduction in channel impairment.

In the situation illustrated in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6, the channel impairmenthowever continues to rise so that it again exceeds the soft threshold 32at point 52. At this point, the transmission system according to thepresent invention again detects that the raw ber is unacceptably highand again reduces power from another channel preferably one alsocarrying low priority data. This further reduces the level of traffictransmitted by the system and increases power to the remaining channels.This action reduces the channel impairment to below the soft thresholdlevel 32.

In the situation illustrated in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6, although the channelimpairment increases slightly from this point it then begins to decreaseto a point 56 which reaches a further threshold 54 known as ber_(min).Once the channel impairment has reached the ber_(min) threshold 54 thealgorithm detects that this threshold has been reached and reintroducessome of the traffic that had previously been dropped. Consequently thelevel of channel impairment is increased to point 58. Point 58 is stillbelow the soft threshold level 32, and channel impairment continues tofall to point 60 due to prevailing conditions. When this again hits theber_(min) threshold 54, the system increases the traffic on the other ofthe channels on which traffic had been dropped. Consequently the levelof channel impairment increases to the point 62. At this point alldropped traffic has been reintroduced into the system and thetransmission system can continue as normal.

Curve 64 shows the level of traffic being carried by the system at anygiven time.

Turning now to FIG. 6, curve 42 is again illustrated. In this case, whenthe channel impairment rises above the soft threshold 32 to point 68,the system increases the power to a particular channel which has theeffect of reducing the channel impairment to below the soft thresholdlevel to point 70. However in the situation illustrated the channelimpairment continues to rise to point 72 which is again above the softthreshold level 32. In the illustrated example, the system has nowreached its maximum available power (P_(max)), and therefore it isnecessary for the system to reduce power in a particular channel inorder to reduce the channel impairment to level 74. Eventually, thelevel of channel impairment hits the ber_(min) threshold 54 at point 82at which point power may be increased to the channel on which it wasreduced in order to restore dropped traffic. This has the effect ofincreasing the channel impairment to the point indicated by thereference numeral 76. A further reduction in the channel impairment topoint 78 which is again at the ber_(min) threshold 54 allows the systemto reduce the system power, increasing the channel impairment to point80 which is still below the soft threshold level 32. At this point thetransmission system has regained all dropped traffic and has returned toits original power level.

As can be seen with reference to FIG. 3 and FIGS. 4 to 6, the bit errorrate for each channel is monitored by the transmission system accordingto the present invention. If the ber on a particular channel is greaterthan the ber_(max) and P_(used) is less than P_(max) then the power ofthe transmitter on that channel is increased and P_(used) isrecalculated. If P_(used) is greater than or equal to P_(max) then thecontroller determines whether that channel is a priority channel. If itis a priority channel then transmitter power on a lower priority channelis decreased, and P_(used) is recalculated. If on the other hand thechannel is not a priority channel, then the operator is alerted andtraffic can be dropped from a lower priority channel. The channel couldbe closed, thus allowing power on the other channels to be increased, orit may be adapted to carry additional FEC overhead, resulting inincreased ber of one or more of the remaining channels. In either case,the flow diagram will determine whether or not this change has beensufficient to restore ber to below ber_(max). It is also possible thatber is found to be below the threshold set at ber_(min), in other wordswell below ber_(max). In that case there is scope to reduce the power ofthe transmitter, to recalculate P_(used), and possible to restorepreviously withdrawn traffic. This is also indicated within the flowdiagram.

Raw ber or channel impairment may also be controlled using a four levelsoft decision circuit of the type illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8. In afour level decision circuit, a clock is provided to mark out regulardecision instances 100. At each instant 100 a decision is made between a1, corresponding typically to the signal voltage being greater than thepredetermined threshold and a 0 which corresponds to a voltage less thana threshold. In the four level decision circuit illustrated in FIGS. 6and 7, further information can be provided to distinguish between cleardecisions e.g those where a “1” corresponds to 1 volt above thethreshold, and marginal decision for example when “1?” corresponds tosignal above the threshold but less than one volt. The onset ofoccasional “1?” or “0?” results will give an indication of reducingmargins before a significant increase in actual errors.

In the present situation such a four level soft decision circuit givesthe algorithm forming part of the present invention added informationcompared to information obtained from hard decision circuits and allowsthe opportunity of correcting errors much earlier. The soft decisioncircuitry could be implemented by various methods. It is possible usingsuch a circuit to accumulate the number of “definitely” and “probably”occurrences and calculate a Quality of Line performance figure. Thiscould be used to indicate the amount of margin a particular system hasbefore the transmission system would fail. An advantage of using suchsoft decision circuitry is that it is not reliant on the FEC circuitry.In addition it can operate at a much lower signal to noise ratios thanthe FEC circuitry.

1. A wavelength division multiplexing transmission system, the systemcomprising: a plurality of channels at different wavelengths, eachchannel comprising a transmitter, a receiver, and one or moreamplifiers, the system further comprising for each of the plurality ofchannels: an encoder for encoding data with a coding and; a decoder fordecoding transmitted data; prioritizing means for prioritizing eachchannel according to the data carried on that channel and associatingpriority data with each channel; monitoring means for monitoringdirectly or indirectly raw uncorrected bit errors on each channel; andpower adjusting means for varying the power on a channel in response tothe bit error rate of that channel.
 2. A transmission system accordingto claim 1 wherein each encoder is an FEC encoder.
 3. A transmissionsystem according to claim 1 wherein the monitoring means comprises a FECerror detection circuit.
 4. A transmission system according to claim 1wherein the monitoring means comprises a multi-level soft decisioncircuit.
 5. A transmission system according to claim 1 furthercomprising a controller for controlling the power adjusting means.
 6. Atransmission system according to claim 5 wherein the controllercomprises a control algorithm.
 7. A transmission system according toclaim 1 wherein the power adjusting means is further adapted toadditionally switch off a channel when the channel carries low prioritydata.
 8. A transmission system according to claim 1 further comprisingmeans for pre-emphasizing a channel prior to transmission of data.
 9. Amethod of managing data traffic transmitted via a wavelength divisionmultiplexing transmission system comprising a plurality of channels atdifferent wavelengths, the method comprising the steps of: allocating apriority to data to be transmitted; directing data to a predeterminedchannel in the transmission system according to the priority of thedata; encoding the data prior to transmission using an encoder, anddecoding the data after transmission using a decoder; monitoringdirectly or indirectly, raw uncorrected bit errors on each channel;adjusting the power to each channel in response to the monitored biterror rate and priority of the data of each channel.
 10. A methodaccording to claim 9 wherein the data is encoded with FEC coding.
 11. Amethod according to claim 9 wherein the step of adjusting the power toeach channel includes the step of reducing power to channels carryinglow priority data, such that, if appropriate, a channel carrying lowpriority data is switched off.
 12. A method according to claim 9 furthercomprising a first step of calculating the power budget of the system.13. A method according to claim 9 further comprising a step ofre-calculating the used power whenever power to a channel is adjusted.